United States v. Banks

474 F. App'x 167
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 15, 2012·No. No. 12-6297·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Franklin Banks appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Banks, No. 3:97-cr-00086-JPJ-1 (W.D.Va. Feb. 3, 2012). We grant Banks’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Banks, 474 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2012).

474 F. App'x 167 (United States v. Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related