United States v. Banks

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Banks. Read the opinion of the Court — 320 F. App'x 198
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 17, 2008·No. 08-7074·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7074

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

PAMELA L. BANKS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:05-cr-00131-RAJ-FBS-2)

Submitted: October 23, 2008 Decided: November 17, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pamela L. Banks, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Pamela L. Banks appeals the district court’s order

denying her motion to reduce her sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Banks, No. 2:05-cr-

00131-RAJ-FBS-2 (E.D. Va. May 13, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Banks, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Banks (United States v. Banks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related