United States v. Ballinger
This text of 369 F.3d 1238 (United States v. Ballinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jay Scott BALLINGER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 01-14872.
No. 01-15080.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
May 12, 2004.
Paul S. Kish, Fed. Pub. Def., Atlanta, GA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Amy Levin Weil, Atlanta, GA, Christopher A. Wray, U.S. Atty., Office of Dept. Atty. Gen., Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (Nos. 99-00026-CR-01-2, 01-00032-CR-01-2-WCO); William C. O'Kelley, Judge.
(Opinion Nov. 21, 2002, 312 F.3d 1264, 11th Cir.2002)
Before EDMONDSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, ANDERSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES, BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.*
BY THE COURT:
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
Notes:
Honorable James C. Hill has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
369 F.3d 1238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ballinger-ca11-2004.