United States v. Ballentine

245 F.2d 223
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided May 22, 1957·No. Docket 24623·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the attorney assigned by us on March 25, 1957 has examined the transcript of the testimony at the trial and given the matter as a whole careful consideration and reports that he can find no merit whatever in the appeal and wishes to be relieved, we accede to his request.

Appellant’s application for the assignment of new counsel is denied. United States ex rel. Tierney v. Richmond, 2 Cir, 245 F.2d 222.

Appellant’s motion for an extension of time within which to file a brief and appendix pro se is granted and he may file same at any time on or before September 1, 1957.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ballentine, 245 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1957).

245 F.2d 223 (United States v. Ballentine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Earl Kill Smith
257 F.2d 432 (Second Circuit, 1958)