United States v. Baker

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Baker

614 F. App'x 122

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2015·No. No. 15-6845·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mario N. Baker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Baker, No. 3:08-cr-00088-REP-RCY-1 (E.D.Va. May 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conténtions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mario N. Baker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion seeking a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Baker, No. 3:08-cr-00088-REP-RCY-1 (E.D.Va. May 27, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conténtions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Baker, 614 F. App'x 122 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

614 F. App'x 122 (United States v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related