United States v. Baker

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 5, 2009
• Docket: 08-8149
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8149

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LARRY BAKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:02-cr-00033-RGD-JEB-1)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Baker, Appellant Pro Se. Joseph Evan DePadilla, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Baker appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Baker, No. 2:02-cr-

00033-RGD-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 17, 2008 & entered

Sept. 19, 2008). We deny Baker’s motion for appointment of

counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED