United States v. Baker

523 F.3d 1141, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9294, 2008 WL 1885325
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 2008
Docket07-3002
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 523 F.3d 1141 (United States v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Baker, 523 F.3d 1141, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9294, 2008 WL 1885325 (10th Cir. 2008).

Opinions

ORDER

Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied. Judge Holloway would grant panel rehearing.

The petition for rehearing en banc was transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service. A poll was called on the suggestion for en banc rehearing. The poll did not carry. Consequently, the request for en banc rehearing is denied. Judge McConnell dissents from the denial of the en banc rehearing. A copy of his dissent is attached to and incorporated into this order. Along with Judge McConnell, Judges Briscoe and Lucero voted to grant en banc consideration.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Baker
Tenth Circuit, 2013
State v. Troy Dwayne Payne
Idaho Court of Appeals, 2012

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
523 F.3d 1141, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 9294, 2008 WL 1885325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-baker-ca10-2008.