United States v. Bains

686 F. App'x 737
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedApril 25, 2017
DocketNo. 16-12928 Non-Argument Calendar
StatusPublished
Cited by37 cases

This text of 686 F. App'x 737 (United States v. Bains) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bains, 686 F. App'x 737 (11th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Ufferman, appointed counsel for Thomas Mellor Bains in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent, examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bains’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BMO Bank N.A. v. Bryant
S.D. Alabama, 2025
Chanel, Inc. v. 21913657
S.D. Florida, 2024
LDL Capital, LLC v. Blume
S.D. Florida, 2024

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 F. App'x 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bains-ca11-2017.