SPY OPTIC INC. v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"

• Court: District Court, S.D. Florida
• Decided: March 22, 2022
• Docket: 0:21-cv-62472
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 21-CV-62472-RAR

SPY OPTIC INC.,

Plaintiff, v.

THE INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS ENTITIES, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A,”

Defendants. /

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Final Default Judgment [ECF No. 35] (“Motion”). Plaintiff Spy Optic, Inc. seeks entry of a default final judgment against Defendants, the Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule “A” that operate commercial Internet websites and/or e- commerce stores that infringe Plaintiff’s trademarks and promote and sell counterfeit goods bearing and/or using Plaintiff’s trademarks. See generally Mot. [ECF No. 35]. Plaintiff requests the Court: (1) enjoin Defendants from producing or selling goods that infringe on its trademarks; (2) disable, or at Plaintiff’s election, transfer the domain names at issue to Plaintiff; (3) assign all rights, title, and interest, to the domain names to Plaintiff and permanently delist or deindex the domain names from any Internet search engines; (4) remove the listings and associated images of goods bearing and/or using counterfeits and infringements of Plaintiff’s trademarks at issue, and the goods of each Defendant bearing one or more of Plaintiff’s trademarks held by the Internet marketplaces be surrendered to Plaintiff; and (5) award statutory damages. See generally id. A Clerk’s Default [ECF No. 31] was entered against Defendants on March 10, 2022, after Defendants failed to respond to the Amended Complaint [ECF No. 19], despite having been served. See Proof of Service [ECF No. 29]. The Court having considered the record and noting no opposition to Plaintiff's Motion, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Motion [ECF No. 35] is GRANTED for the reasons stated herein. Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a default final judgment will be entered by separate order. BACKGROUND! A. Factual Background Plaintiff is the owner of the following trademarks, which are valid and registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“Spy Optic Marks”):

Trademark Registration Registration Class / Goods Number Date

1,981,513 June 18,1996 |IC 009. Glasses and sunglasses.

SCOOP 2,146,655 March 24, 1998 |IC 009. Sunglasses. oO! 2,157,268 March 12, 1998 |IC 009. Sunglasses.

LOGAN 3,489,694 August 19, 2008 |IC 009. Sunglasses. IC 035. Retail store services and on- SPY 3,750,166 February 16, _ | line retail store services featuring 2010 sunglasses, sports goggles, and wearing apparel.

' The factual background is taken from Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Motion, and supporting Declarations submitted by Plaintiff.

Page 2 of 24

TRON 3,981,518 June 21,2011 |IC 009. Sunglasses.

HAPPY LENS 4,463,426 January 7, 2014 |1© 00%: Lens used in glasses, sunglasses, and goggles.

MCCOY 4,538,368 May 27, 2014 |IC 009. Sunglasses.

September 1, SPY GLASSES 4,805,274 015 IC 009. Sunglasses.

September 1, SPY LOGAN 4,805,275 015 IC 009. Sunglasses.

September 1, SPY DOOM 4,805,277 015 IC 009. Sunglasses.

September 1, SPY HELM 4,805,292 015 IC 009. Sunglasses.

September 1, SPY TOURING 4,805,293 015 IC 009. Sunglasses.

September 1, SPY FLYNN 4,805,294 015 IC 009. Sunglasses.

November 24, IC 009. Sunglasses; protective 4,859,917 015 goggles for use in motorcycling, skiing, snowboarding, and biking. SPY DISCORD 4,914,603 March 8, 2016 |IC 009. Sunglasses.

DISCORD 4,919,079 March 15, 2016 |IC 009. Sunglasses.

See Decl. of Damon Cook (“Cook Decl.”) [ECF No. 6-2] 9.5. The Spy Optic Marks are used in connection with the development, manufacture, and distribution of high-quality goods in the categories identified above. See id. 9 4—5.

Page 3 of 24

Plaintiff’s representative reviewed and visually inspected the detailed web page captures and photographs reflecting various products bearing Plaintiff’s trademarks offered for sale through the commercial Internet websites and/or e-commerce stores operating under Defendants’ domain names and seller identification names identified on Schedule “A” (“Subject Domain

Names and Seller IDs”) and determined the products were non-genuine, unauthorized versions of Plaintiff’s products. See id. ¶¶ 14–15. Based on its investigation, Plaintiff alleges Defendants have advertised, promoted, offered for sale, or sold goods bearing and/or using what Plaintiff has determined to be counterfeits, infringements, reproductions, or colorable imitations of the Spy Optic Marks. See id.; Am. Compl. ¶¶ 8–14, 24. Defendants are not now, nor have they ever been, authorized or licensed to use, reproduce, or make counterfeits, reproductions, or colorable imitations of the Spy Optic Marks. See Cook Decl. ¶¶ 11, 14–15. B. Procedural Background On December 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed its Complaint and on January 3, 2022, filed its Amended Complaint against Defendants. On December 9, 2021, Plaintiff filed its Ex Parte

Motion for Order Authorizing Alternate Service of Process [ECF No. 7] (“Motion for Alternate Service”). The Court entered an Order Granting the Motion for Alternate Service on December 10, 2021 [ECF No. 10]. In accordance with the December 10, 2021, Order, Plaintiff served each Defendant with a Summons and a copy of the Amended Complaint via electronic mail and website posting on January 4, 2022. See Decl. of Virgilio Gigante (“Gigante Decl.”) [ECF No. 35-5] ¶ 7; Proof of Service [ECF No. 29]. Defendants failed to file an answer or other response, and the time allowed for Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint has since expired. See Gigante Decl. ¶¶ 8–9. To Plaintiff’s knowledge, Defendants are not infants or incompetent persons, and the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act does not apply. See id. ¶ 10. On March 10, 2022, the Clerk entered default against Defendants [ECF No. 31] for failure to plead or otherwise defend pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff now moves the Court for default final judgment against Defendants.

LEGAL STANDARD A party may apply to the court for a default judgment when the defendant fails to timely respond to a pleading. FED. R. CIV. P. 55(b)(2). “A defendant, by his default, admits the plaintiff’s well-pleaded allegations of fact, is concluded on those facts by the judgment, and is barred from contesting on appeal the facts thus established.” Eagle Hosp. Physicians, LLC v. SRG Consulting, Inc., 561 F.3d 1298, 1307 (11th Cir. 2009) (internal quotations omitted) (quoting Nishimatsu Constr. Co. v. Houston Nat’l Bank, 515 F.2d 1200, 1205 (5th Cir. 1975)). However, conclusions of law are to be determined by the court. Mierzwicki v. CAB Asset Mgmt. LLC, No. 14-61998, 2014 WL 12488533, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 30, 2014). Therefore, a court may enter a default judgment only if there is a “sufficient basis to state a claim.” Id.

Once a plaintiff has established a sufficient basis for liability, the Court must conduct an inquiry to determine the appropriate damages. PetMed Express, Inc. v. MedPets.Com, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d 1213, 1217 (S.D. Fla. 2004). Although an evidentiary hearing is generally required, the Court need not conduct such a hearing “when . . . additional evidence would be truly unnecessary to a fully informed determination of damages.” Safari Programs, Inc. v. CollectA Int’l Ltd., 686 F. App’x 737, 746 (11th Cir. 2017). Therefore, where the record adequately supports the award of damages, an evidentiary hearing is not required. See SEC v. Smyth, 420 F.3d 1225, 1232 n.13 (11th Cir. 2005); PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d at 1217, 1223 (finding an evidentiary hearing unnecessary because plaintiff was seeking statutory damages under the Lanham Act); Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. Casa Los Martnez Corp., No. 14-22859, 2014 WL 4948632, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 2, 2014) (same). ANALYSIS A. Claims

Plaintiff seeks a default judgment for the relief sought in the Amended Complaint, asserting the following claims against Defendants: (1) trademark counterfeiting and infringement under section 32 of the Lanham Act, in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1114 (“Claim 1”); (2) false designation of origin under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1125(a) (“Claim 2”); (3) cybersquatting under section 43(d) of the Lanham Act, in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1125(d) (“Claim 3”); (4) unfair competition under Florida common law (“Claim 4”); and (5) trademark infringement under Florida common law (“Claim 5”). See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 46–80. 1. Counterfeiting and Infringement Section 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. section 1114, provides liability for trademark

infringement if, without the consent of the registrant, a defendant uses “in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark . . . which . . . is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.” 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)(a). To prevail on its trademark infringement claim, a plaintiff must demonstrate “(1) that it had prior rights to the mark at issue and (2) that the defendant had adopted a mark or name that was the same, or confusingly similar to its mark, such that consumers were likely to confuse the two.” Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc., 261 F.3d 1188, 1193 (11th Cir. 2001) (footnote and citations omitted). 2. False Designation of Origin The test for liability for false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. section 1125(a) is the same as for a trademark counterfeiting and infringement claim—i.e., whether the public is likely to be deceived or confused by the similarity of the marks at issue. See Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco

Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763, 780 (1992) (Stevens, J., concurring in the judgment). 3. Cybersquatting The Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (“ACPA”) protects the owner of a distinctive or famous trademark from another’s bad faith intent to profit from the trademark owner’s mark by registering or using a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to, or dilutive of, the trademark owner’s mark without regard to the goods or services of the parties. See 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d). “To prevail under the ACPA, a plaintiff must prove that (1) its mark is distinctive or famous and entitled to protection; (2) the defendant’s domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the plaintiff’s mark; and (3) the defendant registered or used the domain name with a bad faith intent to profit.” See Bavaro Palace, S.A. v. Vacation Tours, Inc., 203 F.

App’x 252, 256 (11th Cir. 2006) (citing Shields v. Zuccarini, 254 F.3d 476, 482 (3d Cir. 2001)). 4. Common Law Unfair Competition Whether a defendant’s use of a plaintiff’s trademarks created a likelihood of confusion between the plaintiff’s and the defendant’s products is also the determining factor in the analysis of unfair competition under the common law of Florida. See Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Forrester, No. 83-8381, 1986 WL 15668, at *3–4 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 9, 1986) (“[I]t is clear that the Court need not find ‘actual confusion’ . . . . The proper test is ‘likelihood of confusion . . . .”’). 5. Common Law Trademark Infringement The analysis of liability for Florida common law trademark infringement is the same as the analysis of liability for trademark infringement under section 32(a) of the Lanham Act. See PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d at 1217–18.

B. Liability The well-pleaded factual allegations of Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint properly contain the elements for each of the above claims and are admitted by virtue of Defendants’ defaults. See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 8–14, 24–38, 48–50, 54–58, 62–67, 72–73, and 78–79. Moreover, the Amended Complaint’s factual allegations have been substantiated by sworn declarations and other evidence and establish Defendants’ liability for each of the claims asserted. Accordingly, default judgment pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is appropriately entered against Defendants. C. Relief Plaintiff requests an award of equitable relief and monetary damages against Defendants

for trademark infringement in Claim 1 and cybersquatting in Claim 3. The Court analyzes Plaintiff’s request for relief as to Claim 1 and Claim 3 only, as the judgment for Claims 2, 4, and 5—false designation of origin, common law unfair competition, and common law trademark infringement—is limited to entry of the requested equitable relief for Claim 1. See generally Mot. [ECF No. 35]. Injunctive Relief. Pursuant to the Lanham Act, a district court is authorized to issue an injunction “according to the principles of equity and upon such terms as the court may deem reasonable,” to prevent violations of trademark law. 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a). Indeed, “[i]njunctive relief is the remedy of choice for trademark and unfair competition cases, since there is no adequate remedy at law for the injury caused by a defendant’s continuing infringement.” Burger King Corp. v. Agad, 911 F. Supp. 1499, 1509–10 (S.D. Fla. 1995) (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Sandlin, 846 F.2d 1175, 1180 (9th Cir. 1988)). Injunctive relief is available even in the default judgment setting,

see, e.g., PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d at 1222–23, because Defendants’ failure to respond or otherwise appear makes it difficult for a plaintiff to prevent further infringement absent an injunction. See Jackson v. Sturkie, 255 F. Supp. 2d 1096, 1103 (N.D. Cal. 2003) (“[D]efendant’s lack of participation in this litigation has given the court no assurance that defendant’s infringing activity will cease. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to permanent injunctive relief.”). Permanent injunctive relief is appropriate where a plaintiff demonstrates: (1) it has suffered irreparable injury; (2) there is no adequate remedy at law; (3) the balance of hardship favors an equitable remedy; and (4) an issuance of an injunction is in the public’s interest. See eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC., 547 U.S. 388, 391–92 (2006). Plaintiff has carried its burden

on each of the four factors. Specifically, in trademark cases, “a sufficiently strong showing of likelihood of confusion [caused by trademark infringement] may by itself constitute a showing of . . . a substantial threat of irreparable harm.” E. Remy Martin & Co., S.A. v. Shaw-Ross Int’l Imports, Inc., 756 F.2d 1525, 1530 (11th Cir. 1985) (footnote omitted); see also Levi Strauss & Co. v. Sunrise Int’l Trading Inc., 51 F.3d 982, 986 (11th Cir. 1995) (“There is no doubt that the continued sale of thousands of pairs of counterfeit jeans would damage [the plaintiff’s] business reputation and decrease its legitimate sales.”). Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint and the submissions show that the goods produced and sold by Defendants are nearly identical to Plaintiff’s genuine products, and consumers viewing Defendants’ counterfeit goods post-sale would actually confuse them for Plaintiff’s genuine products. See, e.g., Am. Compl. ¶ 85 (“Defendants’ actions are likely to cause confusion of consumers at the time of initial interest, sale, and in the post-sale setting, who will believe all of Defendants’ goods are genuine goods originating from, associated with, and/or

approved by Plaintiff.”). Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law so long as Defendants continue to operate the Subject Domain Names and Seller IDs because Plaintiff cannot control the quality of what appear to be its products in the marketplace. An award of monetary damages alone will not cure the injury to Plaintiff’s reputation and goodwill if Defendants’ infringing and counterfeiting continue. Moreover, Plaintiff faces hardship from loss of sales and its inability to control its reputation in the marketplace. By contrast, Defendants face no hardship if they are prohibited from the infringement of Plaintiff’s trademarks. Finally, the public interest supports the issuance of a permanent injunction against Defendants to prevent consumers from being misled by Defendants’ products, and potentially harmed by their inferior quality. See Chanel, Inc. v.

besumart.com, 240 F. Supp. 3d 1238, 1291 (S.D. Fla. 2016) (“[A]n injunction to enjoin infringing behavior serves the public interest in protecting consumers from such behavior.”) (citation omitted); World Wrestling Entm’t, Inc. v. Thomas, No. 12-21018, 2012 WL 12874190, at *8 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 11, 2012) (considering the potential for harm based on exposure to potentially hazardous counterfeit merchandise in analyzing public’s interest in an injunction). Broad equity powers allow the Court to fashion injunctive relief necessary to stop Defendants’ infringing activities. See, e.g., Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.S. 1, 15 (1971) (“Once a right and a violation have been shown, the scope of a district court’s equitable powers to remedy past wrongs is broad, for . . . [t]he essence of equity jurisdiction has been the power of the Chancellor to do equity and to mould [sic] each decree to the necessities of the particular case.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co., 321 U.S. 707, 724 (1944) (“Equity has power to eradicate the evils of a condemned scheme by prohibition of the use of admittedly valid parts of an invalid whole.”

(citations omitted)). District courts are expressly authorized to order the transfer or surrender of domain names in an in rem action against a domain name. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1125(d)(1)(C), (d)(2). However, courts have not limited the remedy to that context. See, e.g., Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Otamedia Ltd., 331 F. Supp. 2d 228, 230 n.2 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (transferring Yesmoke.com domain name to plaintiff despite the fact the plaintiff did not own a trademark in the term “Yesmoke” and noting 15 U.S.C. section 1125 “neither states nor implies that an in rem action against the domain name constitutes the exclusive remedy for a plaintiff aggrieved by trademark violations in cyberspace”); Ford Motor Co. v. Cross, 441 F. Supp. 2d 837, 853 (E.D. Mich. 2006) (ordering the defendants to disclose all other domain registrations held by them and to transfer registration of a particular domain name to plaintiff in part under authority of 15

U.S.C. section 1116(a)). Defendants have created an Internet-based counterfeiting scheme in which they are profiting from their deliberate misappropriation of Plaintiff’s rights. Accordingly, the Court may fashion injunctive relief to eliminate the means by which Defendants are conducting their unlawful activities. Appropriate remedies to achieve this end include ordering the cancellation or transfer of the Subject Domain Names to Plaintiff; removing the Seller IDs’ listings and images of goods; and requiring that the goods of each Defendant be surrendered to Plaintiff, such that these means may no longer be used as instrumentalities to further the sale of counterfeit goods. Statutory Damages. In a case involving the use of counterfeit marks in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or distribution of goods, 15 U.S.C. section 1117(c) provides that a plaintiff may elect an award of statutory damages at any time before final judgment is rendered in the sum of not less than $1,000.00 nor more than $200,000.00 per counterfeit mark per type of

good. See 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)(1). In addition, if the Court finds Defendants’ counterfeiting actions were willful, it may impose damages above the maximum limit up to $2,000,000.00 per counterfeit mark per type of good. See 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)(2). The Court has wide discretion to determine the amount of statutory damages. See PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d at 1219 (citations omitted). An award of statutory damages is appropriate despite a plaintiff’s inability to prove actual damages caused by a defendant’s infringement. See Ford Motor Co., 441 F. Supp. 2d at 852 (citations omitted) (“[A] successful plaintiff in a trademark infringement case is entitled to recover enhanced statutory damages even where its actual damages are nominal or non-existent.”); Playboy Enters., Inc. v. Universal Tel-A-Talk, Inc., No. 96-6961, 1998 WL 767440, at *8 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 1998)

(awarding statutory damages where plaintiff failed to prove actual damages or profits). The option of a statutory damages remedy in trademark counterfeiting cases is sensible given evidence of a defendant’s profits in such cases is frequently almost impossible to ascertain. See, e.g., S. Rep. No. 104-177, pt. V § 7, at 10 (1995) (discussing purposes of Lanham Act statutory damages); PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d at 1220 (statutory damages are “[e]specially appropriate in default judgment cases due to infringer nondisclosure”) (citations omitted). This case is no exception. Here, the allegations of the Amended Complaint and the evidence establish the Defendants intentionally copied one or more of the Spy Optic Marks for the purpose of deriving the benefit of Plaintiff’s world-famous reputation. Defendants have defaulted on Plaintiff’s allegations of willfulness. See Am. Compl. ¶ 31; Arista Records, Inc. v. Beker Enters., Inc., 298 F. Supp. 2d 1310, 1313 (S.D. Fla. 2003) (finding a court may infer willfulness from the defendants’ default); PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F. Supp. 2d at 1217 (stating that upon default,

well-pleaded allegations are taken as true). As such, the Lanham Act permits the Court to award up to $2,000,000.00 per infringing mark on each type of good as statutory damages to ensure Defendants do not continue their intentional and willful counterfeiting activities. The only available evidence demonstrates that each Defendant promoted, distributed, advertised, offered for sale, and/or sold at least one (1) type of good bearing at least one (1) mark which is a counterfeit of one of the Spy Optic Marks protected by federal trademark registrations. See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 15, 24–32, 47–51; Cook Decl. 11–15. Based on the above considerations, Plaintiff has asked the Court to award statutory damages in the amount of $1,000,000.00 against each Defendant. See Mot. [ECF No. 35] at 15–16. The award should be sufficient to deter Defendants and others from continuing to counterfeit or otherwise infringe

Plaintiff’s trademarks, compensate Plaintiff, and punish Defendants, all stated goals of 15 U.S.C. section 1117(c). The Court finds that this award of statutory damages falls within the permissible range under 15 U.S.C. section 1117(c) and is just. See Fendi S.R.L. v. Joe Bag, No. 19-61356, 2019 WL 4693677 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 28, 2019) [ECF No. 43] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Adidas AG v. Global Online Shopping, No. 19-61180 (S.D. Fla. 2019) [ECF No. 36] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Louis Vuitton Malletier v. lv2014.skrar, No. 19-61015 (S.D. Fla. 2019) [ECF No. 40] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Artemis Gesdy, No. 19-60287 (S.D. Fla. 2019) [ECF No. 36] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Fendi S.R.L. v. socjmkfn, No. 19-61356 (S.D. Fla. 2019) [ECF No. 44] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Goyard St Honore v. Agote, No. 17- 62276, 2018 WL 2006870 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 19, 2018) [ECF No. 49] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. v. 17 No.1-Own,

No. 17-61201, 2017 WL 3016929 (S.D. Fla. July 14, 2017) [ECF No. 44] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant). Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint also sets forth a cause of action for cybersquatting pursuant to the ACPA, 15 U.S.C. section 1125(d). As admitted by default, and established by the evidence submitted, Defendant Numbers 1–8 have acted with the bad-faith intent to profit from at least one of the Spy Optic Marks and the goodwill associated with the Spy Optic Marks by registering their respective Subject Domain Names which are identical, confusingly similar to, or dilutive of at least one of the Spy Optic Marks (“Cybersquatted Subject Domain Names”). See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 33–38, 62-68; Mot. at 29 (“Schedule B”). The Cybersquatted Subject Domain Name incorporates at least one of Plaintiff’s trademarks in its entirety surrounded by a

descriptive or generic term, rendering the domain name nearly identical to at least one of Plaintiff’s trademarks. Upon a finding of liability, the ACPA expressly empowers the Court to “order the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark.” See 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(1)(c); Victoria’s Cyber Secret Ltd. P’ship v. Secret Catalogue, Inc., 161 F. Supp. 2d 1339, 1356 (S.D. Fla. 2001). Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled to the transfer and ownership of Defendant Numbers 1–8’s Cybersquatted Subject Domain Names because it is confusingly similar to at least one of Plaintiff’s trademarks. Additionally, Plaintiff may elect at any time before final judgment to recover actual damages or statutory damages of not less than $1,000.00 and not more than $100,000.00 per domain name, as the Court considers just. See 15 U.S.C. § 1117(d). Plaintiff has elected statutory damages and requests in view of Defendant Numbers 1—8’s intentional, wrongful behavior, an award in the amount of $10,000.00 for its infringing domain name. See Mot. 18— 19; Taverna Opa Trademark Corp. v. Ismail, No. 08-20776, 2010 WL 1838384, at *3 (S.D. Fla. May 6, 2010) (awarding $10,000.00 in statutory damages for domain name at issue). The Court finds this amount is just. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff is entitled to the entry of final default judgment. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Motion [ECF No. 35] is GRANTED. Default final judgment and a permanent injunction shall be entered by separate order. DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 22nd day of March, 2022.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 15 of 24

SCHEDULE “A” DEFENDANTS BY NUMBER, SUBJECT DOMAIN NAME, SELLER ID, FINANCIAL ACCOUNT INFORMATION, MERCHANT ID, INFRINGING PRODUCT NUMBER, AND E-MAIL

Defendant / Financial Account Information: Defendant PayPal Merchant Infringing Product Subject Domain Name PayPal Account / Payee / Store Number ID Number / Additional Email / Seller ID Number QihuaLms87@outlook.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 spy-outlets.com langmanjgmiyo@gmail.com t.com xinyuandalj@outlook.com 2YNQGN249F42A service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 acvpe.shop LongQsss15@outlook.com t.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 mcdcown.shop KeLilusong@outlook.com t.com reeghandbsjgb@gmail.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 ralpher.site Yun-z Network Technology Co., KHRDTU7G5V3RN t.com Ltd LJiansf14@outlook.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 sp.rvpd.shop reeghandbsjgb@gmail.com t.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 spopsunglass.shop WguangXzx64@outlook.com t.com Yun-z Network Technology Co., 1 spyoptiglasses.shop KHRDTU7G5V3RN Ltd Yun-z Network Technology Co., 1 spy-optiglasses.shop KHRDTU7G5V3RN Ltd DuaneRigginsdlc@gmail.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 spysunglasses.shop xionganyunze@outlook.com t.com service@noreply.spfactoryou 1 spy-sunglasses.shop Weixyzzm80@outlook.com t.com cskwdzfdh649@outlook.com service@noreply.spfactoryou Sharp Liss Mall 1 xtydd.shop t.com Yun-z Network Technology Co., KHRDTU7G5V3RN service@dealsvipuw.shop Ltd spymensandwomenssun service@noreply.vipclientwe 2 Populargoods2021@outlook.com VPBBB3L87UKNW glasses.online b.com Fuyang Chuangmi Electronic 2 spyglasses.online VPBBB3L87UKNW Commerce Co., Ltd. spymensandwomenssunFuyang Chuangmi Electronic 2 VPBBB3L87UKNW glasses.shop Commerce Co., Ltd. service@noreply.spvipcs.co 3 spysunglasss.shop Soyadgming@outlook.com m service@noreply.spvipcs.co 3 spsunglassi.shop mzguangxun@hotmail.com m SO YA Home Building materials 3 spyglasses.shop 5YXTF5MP942QW Co., Ltd service@noreply.spvipcs.co 3 spyopglasss.shop bjylqdsmlx217@outlook.com LV8XE2QQX4TXL m service@service.glassddmail. 4 spyplusglasses.shop SufondiBusiness@outlook.com XB82FABLB5AEY com yichuanghua2265@outlook.com service@service.glassddmail. 4 spyplussunglasses.shop Dejapopulor@outlook.com com service@service.glassddmail. 4 spyprosunglasses.shop yuanxinhong520@outlook.com com lutherdesigninc@outlook.com service@noreply.bestretailsal 5 spysunglasses.store vttantiusly@outlook.com PAV5EAJ668PGG e.com choiceGroupt@outlook.com 2Q5Y7XD5RT6VL highwaylifestyle@outlook.com cloudwelldeal@outlook.com service@noreply.bestretailsal 5 spsunglassale.shop Three Kingdoms Business Service e.com PAV5EAJ668PGG (Chongqing) Co., Ltd. 6 spysunglassi.shop LeiMoneys34@outlook.com 7 spyglassesdztr.shop wangguanfang4100@hotmail.com YULBEJTZ8LUE8 7 spdai.shop Terence Online Centre YULBEJTZ8LUE8 7 spdfh.shop Terence Online Centre YULBEJTZ8LUE8 FoshanBeldenshop@outlook.com U74DXH4TB3BLJ

Terence Online Centre YULBEJTZ8LUE8 binlidatrading@outlook.com GTUQNMS8UYPC 7 spyglasses21.shop Y yishanclothingshop@outlook.com 3SYSBMF65RZEQ mantinggeclothing@outlook.com 9TQ2EPSSVU7VS support@noreply.usglassessh 7 spyglasseswear.shop wangguanfang4100@hotmail.com YULBEJTZ8LUE8 op.com wangguanfang4100@hotmail.com YULBEJTZ8LUE8

7 spzth.shop Chandler Outlet Shop Y9J89XE52FHPL EAPM79JPAs@outlook.com support@noreply.usglassessh 7 spzzf.shop Terence Online Centre YULBEJTZ8LUE8 op.com ZinaOwens2500@hotmail.com 8N6B3LJPJPPUC Farrell Fashion Market LAVDYHARMNG8 zhaolin5063wv@hotmail.com W support@noreply.usglassessh 7 spysunglassesbsnc.shop lingfantradeshop@outlook.com S69RUAJQ682KE op.com ruimiaoclothingstore ruimiaoclothingstore@outlook.co AYTYK3T24S7U6 m xushuang1996815@outlook.com support@noreply.usglassessh 7 fwysunglasses.xyz YuanZhenhua9720@outlook.com op.com GaoJincheng0201@outlook.com support@noreply.usglassessh 7 noaglassesoutlet.online duanfei5847@hotmail.com T6PRHFMJA7DP6 op.com bethanypeterson38@hotmail.com E6CDQ9K6WZH72 zhanglisha226@outlook.com SDC33XZJPEMP8 VKXRZCTCMSS6 zhouli9636@outlook.com G johnrussell5398@hotmail.com W4BB4YRB8GD24 XiaoyuCommerceStore@outlook. 48YBJPZBSP8V6 com JaydaColeman880@hotmail.com CVZU66HDD4844 Hangzhou Miyou Trading 8 spysunglassesopid.shop Company L5H9R97ELK7Q4 xuhongliang1977@outlook.com hancuimingfangshop@outlook.co 84WUZA72BZ2LN

m 9 tgbdm.shop crayfishsite@zoho.com.cn sale@tgbdm.shop support@noreply.ixglassessh 10 xjhmyj.online Fr0i6hxivn9ELWR@outlook.com op.com Transaction ID: 14 all_in_onestore 353497455468 5CE88951U7101741V Transaction ID: 18 jackma21 284325842071 70P48822WR178905H Transaction ID: 21 locas_6443 393407815919 6N973421KF253070U 23 88bar yitanghuameng22@163.com 194260700085 24 chonganstore chathumilakshan@gmail.com 393314084511 fanzhifandz@outlook.com 384062558634 25 fanshop88 Transaction ID: 384062558634 001121515L837603J global-shop-online canosacasa@gmail.com 174270267341 26 a/k/a subastas-outlet- Transaction ID: 174270267341 2000 48G31184JS6765017 27 globix.store narek719957@gmail.com 363324987853 28 hahaeveryday gao19851224ka@hotmail.com 324669771750 happyniuniu2019@aliyun.com 253757925740 29 happyniu2019 Transaction ID: 253757925740 8EH691478Y3982244 30 happysolutions happysolutions.zj@gmail.com 373554128163 31 maryord-14 timght@gmail.com 402754603639 32 tha_baby thababy987@gmail.com 133797341544 33 the_full_cart.store icontrolss99@gmail.com 265081772037 priyantha.kumara19890317@gma 34 ukstorelk 265093620855 il.com 35 universalestore99 razvanszalacsi@yahoo.com 384048024996 36 v*lianxstore*v guodonggeng1988@163.com 284250780141 37 Cycling Travel Store 900243034 1005001388699641 1005001345949234 38 Dian&Yang Store 5434117 4000649124725 1005002091965733 39 GOOOG Store 911239106 1005001872859645 40 OANRAYS Store 4052093 32969943538 Phineed Sunglasses 1005002301760882 41 4495053 Drop Shipping Store 1005002301795675 42 Shop5023094 Store 5023094 1005001464791457 1005002300669941 Sunglasses Franchised 43 1452061 1005002539362463 Store 1005002539326773 1005002320327092 44 URUS Store 3133026 1005001471344671 45 Awesome Glasses Store 5798675 1005002549002212 32891145534 chengcheng Sunglasses 46 4033087 32873124816 Store 32884525314 GOOD SUNGLASSES 47 911908147 1005002547762105 Store MG-SUNGLASSES 1005002348393871 48 911757441 Store 1005002719478226 1005001692280821 49 RoadBlock Store 911032014 1005001708266561 1005002136925298 50 Shop5081471 Store 5081471 1005002137018039 1005001557924283 51 Shop900251481 Store 900251481 1005002092047673 1005002109821602 1005003088913605 1005002819632831 52 Shop911515004 Store 911515004 1005002488104343 1005002487928865 1005002487953798 Sunbright Sunglasses 53 911790020 1005002390845265 Drop Shopper Store 54 WF Store 4445007 32926023003 55 WGESUN Store 911773151 1005002932195393 56 Ywjanp Store 4639086 32959547173 57 ZAIQING Store 5427086 4000325606340 ZSMEYE Official 58 4215017 1005001616975103 Store 59 danuelhouses 21635550 664599247 60 dhgate_bagss 21661176 688783944 61 dhgate_glasses 21661179 688782742 62 dhgateclothing 21661172 688941880 63 guomimenlu 15749601 449066521 64 happydhgatestores 21609010 629298204 65 hermane 20329350 671141868 66 kingclothings 21661145 688786877 67 kingfashionmall 21661189 688785777 68 kingqueenhair 21661187 688784272 69 kingsunglasses 21661174 688782804 70 ladyqueens 21661185 688820767 71 mingsdhgateso 21641914 673141382 72 qy8sunglasses 21639619 662100612 73 skywatchs 21661133 688782499 74 superbagss 21661184 688994631 75 troydaniels 21635198 671814594 76 hopesunglasses 20732060 402274523 77 ppfashionshop 20765093 412716568 605806b53a6f62b168a0d254 605c3106dcda4feba2d1bd13 78 Ailefent Lemeng Taiger 5ec26d4aa6438b57a5042fbe 60668f80f2a102b79d31f7e4 606565719f5f961d4f5fb613 79 Banbudadada 5b3091657752c8045c725e64 6076b1868cec4da62d734fcb 80 Best of Tumblr 601fa7f6044fbb2d0c901c97 607e8d0f880029352d9033df 81 briqoghve 5e5b4954f5995fcdddce110d 60586083735a5f953c4af1ea 606b32b62c207bdd160e4e93 607c3fd52d2ceee395db22a0 82 chcan23 5ebf375bbf13a520032b35a6 606dcecb0e715f594ef10f56 60abf8ac423bda26dbd10344 84 Fashion taste of life 586fbd8b8c30e82bdcce557d 5f43839ff371645631d37bf9 85 fghyhcfue 5fa0d10433a6743e629e86db 60628b628a5caf64de3931e4 86 gaoshan Store 5f58944614f157568adff656 606c6cf901f55a576636d422 Happy shopping 87 586e3c438c30e8093e5c6bc3 5f4383a96cd8f977eb6782af GOGOGOGO 88 hnxiaodong1027 603f54b4c45b713b857d534d 6052e42bd3e0b009f7083308 89 jntajtjmtj 5b0243a37d4d84171b90b7fe 6051bb522b1c9d3b3840e609 90 Just For You Baby 5837fc7e0299bc07d974a4da 60795b08c89f6d79bc265664 91 likuibaihuopu 5e5e17df6a6aff18ea64f93b 605d5159711b379ef828d244 92 meiqingmuxiu 5d7f4382b6b4c23c83cceb46 606d5e472329ed5608fd6704 93 mengmenga 5d831e6422e7777c42dc187e 604864b3bdcaa4ba10641c41 6064188d3f9f2b5b41a17d3d 94 Neuroscience Online 601fac7b4eeb7304eab94012 6051a6971b25d3f4f5a2ba3b 95 nixiao 5941185a20d56c1aaf9ccd6d 606c4c9b76908ce4a4530181 96 QHU78SHI 5d5b867e283abc43e94a3320 60826ba1ca26625c5a067cd3 97 qinmingjingpinpu 5e5f910ca6757d1882435a7c 6059acc2000beb93a5d0f99f 98 sadweqd22 5d5b44a634037d39c521bca3 6073e37e9391ad3779706b74 99 shiqiaofengya 5d7f50a48c8dc70a40b96bf4 60655ca591bc9d06d7fff27c 606edf0216bd9eeef7c9477f 100 SHUTEBO4 5aaf8ab8b9605f1f0501e064 606558a016d8a100d1f4f747 6073d9a9a6b2fb23cb0e837d Shuwak Bairand 101 5ec8f713f3f35248964b9e36 60580f25406b07a1f58892b2 Qilasrert 102 smeathebphd 5e96ad30ecbf9d3a78765f37 5f6ac45c6b2e4b0a49e0d2a0 103 sooplight 57d12217c496d10fd6a706fd 6064174781ef15589b5ee7de 104 tuesdrtg 5e37a660a548d5447592acbd 6056f3df094529d668b7168a 105 uzice 5fcf5bbbf7b2025cb191b7df 606aa8791c34b45835e881d4 106 wangzhikun666 5e5098947b7ddf054069a67e 5ff9751b4f35c096b78aa941 107 Warmspringsun 5af6901c7824ca1f63417eef 606eae330b72966cec7a5872 108 Week bar 576f43c1007370740c4bed34 5f4383b6045f830039e4c868 109 WLH store 587a23db0366d00cb28dd4f1 5f37de71b4faef0051293e04 111 zfyyouth0101 5a38a7d512fa1c56af8f093a 607948fb08e3be45290b9bde 112 zhaohaofeng 584833b3582efa13144a8364 60ae657419e6fdfe1d215358 113 apilooking 58a56b643a8c36510ee68041 6085131ced0358ee18154813 114 neutrally fly 59205c7e81f8e7245bf5140e 60cc6e4d0f8ea26a65f71f56 6065427005ea2db96c78c519 115 MISSGU 59771e8fc7f5051ea2f6674e 60f0fd7fd3c058554fb83dc7 6094b32ca5410564d08a03a7 116 czyouth2029 59e99bab5d6f343c89a617e6 60bad77d8f1da43a81e1f1f9 117 tatalo115 5abc92364215952aaf9e949b 608688312c450d6b0e62935e 118 luoxiansheng 5abfcdaea6f62e41d1698be6 608a1bcee76a660e831249e1 119 bingbadaoao 5b02226b66ca1b177872dcb0 60667a43afcf635ea99a0036 122 Zhaozhao2 5b2cb14c5676c3789521c70d 6093541df484137aa5ce156c 123 NB yi 5b4da960d5dbc2205d4422e0 606563578f61401a85d399ef 124 duo-guo 5b90b3d08d567673376780ac 60af2bdcc8611502546de40d 125 Game & Toys 5d3f1660e4b65d62081e7379 609a43fc4878deed03450421 126 krhs 5d42c9ab8388970cf92a26c4 606c283bf4ee697c73b7dcc9 127 44j6trw 5d43e8124c78556cc1e59ba1 60655e1e4dd35e0628d0ddd9 128 89gagky 5d43f95170327a6cea6831d7 606d15242133e28db22f4ae6 129 nkjdvv 5d491d667ad2420a41ba4b13 609b8e0de60c465636037cac 130 Yoogamer 5d50d8507ad242504df71fbd 60cc23a41da1f1ca823a7ae6 131 ZZML 5d626d3127367804f6ad691f 6114c2ab1c541f519cd74951 132 aijia-liuxin 5d7dc08a8c8dc75f83888523 60dfdfc151488ac5aa996a66 133 wenchenggongzhu 5d7f4d2a2888354bc2398112 60654237fc05b4bb845d9541 134 enjoy oneself nice 5d821eb71c4dc67a24f4983d 60826b84df16f1400d4b874a 135 1212ZX 5d82d3dc7e8eba597d35cdae 606680db3b7c5386534dadba 136 KOUYB761 5d88241a8c8dc7531846c080 606c01119c5b33125161530a 137 QIYYY12 5d8c5fed7137803c00f0cd88 606556513fa761f05cd99ec3 138 vidmhjf 5e211bed54e85f0645e903ef 60cabd743ae6ceb7267ca0cf 139 iandgero 5e3693d5e489d51c6c965ccd 607a78ea68dc6e2242f89dcf 140 xinyuxiaodian 5e590c271c24e498554bb3ca 60cabca6a444b9ab2c2c409d 141 baueklus 5e5b50936ac64ed6bef9d7b0 6059ac9aa924ffa78997d4e8 142 qinmingzahuopu 5e5f81bcec5cd32a4141320e 60713d8dd3d4c732bddc8c17 143 qinmingjingpin 5e5f8a2ac422b90ddf57dc0b 606ea34b5996913f9bef211b 144 guanshengzahuo 5e5f9f7ea6757d426b430299 609cbbf6c295327826236e64 145 grieiydebso 5e6089e2cdcecef095820158 60b8b38045bdf62c28ba09e6 60655d35c633db023a4f0fc9 61249a61f9af80226d64591d 146 zhangqingbaihuo 5e60eb50cce71246311386d7 606c3de698a6ffc498d74012 60cc3c81cc44fb02093fc83f 147 dongpingxiaodian 5e61c752c6cc3a12cd89d456 605ef017b9efaf464af56a66 606fedcb03c36b31b85d80ca 148 rannujoqge 5e670ba2589024313913f491 607ec6e47839f8b763074697 149 Autumn Vogelx 5e685212f2699a321ec3cd28 5f655c24491d290040e36ef0 150 wfh09 5e6932d72fb13fe3c20a9328 607d3de9a357035eea00e68c 151 YunraojidL 5e6ce5171e1985070025312b 6094ef60111b0200ed21286c 152 YHJWAN 5e71dafedada4f0047d046e0 60fbb7304e7c0a4e100a0b12 153 Antonioza 5e7472d64e1e8233d02c17c7 6121c606a160fbccc4d44813 154 znufcu 5e78cb3b4fed550ec06652f8 60cc2503ae0654db16f36f29 155 guss6g4q0oc4 5e80b477e273cd57004b2f81 60ee8ec5b61b6968c6d04b40 156 mclasetfvvo 5e904d4e9bbc2b09428f055f 608506bfdaf5b3ff07164a70 157 daffitbljfau 5e93647f46be6ad700df1e05 60201c591138a6ca7141f8e5 158 teeteightvju 5e93779ca93effe22247901c 608ebc174304ef7e0d0bdeae 159 thotethoby 5e937c14a93effe4cf4790b0 60c4e4721a1b83b1c02ec32e 160 titateskixles 5e958aee0bd69706e2155a5d 5f655c005c090f2ac6e8cb19 161 losekkgy 5e958c4365a1793001fc9822 5f655c059c952d30e879f880 162 slithesbnoosj 5e958e8edc7da93bdb768103 5f655bfa6e695630c625c979 163 sheshiriemc 5e958efadc7da93bb47681f1 5f655bfbd868940040745a64 164 nesheighoyroe 5e958f7f3b55ac02001a4abd 5f655bfc329c60004f0e33a8 165 patitoughmexaa 5e958ff94ebef1398df4ec82 5f655bfdd6d5b82ebf282987 166 mcshoorefkhiqp 5e9590e6fbe93c37856fcb83 5f655bfe6b556513890a4b20 167 toatasuqpff 5e959a26ec27b440dbcb9bfc 5f6ac49696703b003eda2d95 168 shockoufs 5e96c11e058b714c78edc5e6 5f655c26377fb73330945be7 169 Marilynyya 5e987135920fc8bad4f28db0 5f655c088ab312311a7f7025 170 CharlesUUa 5e992ab629e7861e74d267ef 5f655bf943b3a13285201104 171 Terraaa 5e9967bbeece7658c06696fb 5f655c208ab31234237f628e 172 angelaaaa 5e9968e95ca37f2315577c7b 5f655c0a03764d003dbfaa04 173 Lisaaaa 5e996d6229e7866629d2668a 5f655c0c7348d12d8ad245d1 174 Luisaa 5e9970eaeece7632026724c2 5f655c22d696590045b0e126 175 TracyAnneaa 5e997707f4479b8161df335a 5f655c0e2745750df87cebf3 176 Amyaa 5e9977d2eda468830dbeb3f2 5f655c0798368f34ddb34d41 177 Brianaa 5e9979e85ca37f31ce577c1f 5f655c06cd8a68378dfc5149 602012bd1473460050b5de2 178 Williamaaee 5ea2501173900e124a7c8a56 d 179 Markaaee 5ea255eec8d26d16c0e98755 5f70b469eb378c2929694683 180 Oliviaaaee 5ea2563641e7f02f7aad7cdd 5f655bebc3bc7f318d9091eb 181 pataaee 5ea25926e34afe0440dfba96 5f655bee5616ce3131b19000 182 Senbeneng cots 5efebc2892285a6b467c5878 608b66d90e71d539c563c2d0 183 torowivens 5f06aa9ab730762c440effa6 608af6fe06c6761c756eb5eb 184 mjtyj 5f2e4481a1eaf802e8b78a55 60f7d578477be8bd4792ce7d 185 iposter6653 5f40969136d382840e1a4517 60c4834a25c5611d54189876 186 Shoperan 5f427ee829e78637230587fa 60c663b13c367a6e1d1f684d 187 MariaJeans 5f43227d29e7863e700587ac 608bb147e9c150ddaa86e108 188 HTHRT 5f4648a006543fd4db394ffc 60b476290a785b18f3cc6b73 189 Porron shop 5f51c81603c06e25012e1e9c 607a036bb64f2aac661b4bfd 190 Ronald david barrios 5f6b57683e645b3d7658ffcd 6081e44af36d5bf2886fda47 191 Variedades Yuli 5f6bd4374cc3885930be9f66 6086315571569021208bafde 192 Creaciones jbelen 5f6be07bd2741989f75fadc6 6080875d11c3497a0bcd89df 193 Oxirisplayolv 5f6e2b0aa498d577a735ed90 607d2ab7afb4dc058c8d0e3e 194 Catshop.vicky 5f73d18ade6a5337a8ce3c55 609097ef8e747b90139674c5 195 facilitoandre2 5f7425a009237cbea0ba738f 607911e754dd90af7503ee59 197 zhanggang68 5f7eaa9d498e2b10ea8fa7a1 606c5f014ef5751bec9c78cd 198 Market Truts Crosk 5f7fa03f1689b500505d28a3 607f7696988fd8005e95b242 199 hangyungjian 5f7ff538e64ad803fc562f9e 606c5dcc4859a50d60e2910a 200 hybridization 5f8db7ba19a61afb83f6c187 60c3fa43d18ef90632d8284d 201 laevulose 5f8dbe1fc525e5b69c1dab83 60dfd8697c6203ca979b1957 202 Dickens 5f8dd4661c80850d30f16476 611a44f4c6b3c700771d3244 203 QISHENE 5f8f5f56de940f07c2c7ff6e 6078115b545859cdedde69cb 204 ganocephala 5f8fc15843db78e4bcc9cf73 603dd94074d102a1472fd87d 205 Eviegive 5f9192a5446a0d8f7fd5f823 60a1e8f11370de24003cb533 206 Sigdsjcvhjc 5f9220d319c41e1a0c1bf23d 60a1e8811fada4a2f5aa042f 207 SxCN 5f9a3e3e59048313bdf857a2 6073af4c1e4351b434eeaca6 208 francia y paris 5f9b00ba2a917a027d8af5a4 6090adf8d16a618fd05a3da4 209 pedritoperes212 5f9b11370e46e935f1c80381 607e30c0519b5147ea16c9e1 210 lacasadeloshuevosdeoro 5f9b3a4359048374c9f85630 60853ce8ff1c29f0695ae6a8 211 prendamayoress 5f9b3caa8a161ae5c85ca898 606b7360852e0faa27fd9134 212 Novedades Irene S 5f9b49f8c934d70467f27640 60807944992aca259c6a89ee 213 Brocylon 5f9b59a1c934d7112cf2766e 607c5d4163e3dbddcefe99c1 Oswaldo food fast 214 5f9c61a323aaec7e83a51b7b 605e67e421ad6db221fd331f online inversiones auto 215 5f9d87766535343487d4faa1 607dff536760324444e4ea5a cauchos 216 Desordenados 5f9f5d1116ae6905d12c21b5 608da6295a5e6d0b7fc23b6c 217 huangdan1980 5f9f8afc6535341cf9d4f940 60d591b35d9786008d0e88f8 218 lindos mares 5fc2ff9c10cec6db8f6735c5 608be7a4b5c8885e30366b8a 219 Qacmary 5fc601fabee3db6dac044a31 60f4dbe1c3c1845199b8ae8d 220 Serbeiro 5fcbc49491d2e50dd476120d 60ad8b3a30a15f005dd36571 221 County Seat 5fcc38adb3d3424f52d1c73a 607a69158bafeefc582109a8 222 Superior Interactive 5fcc66d88540d181e21e64b6 6077ce40d434ae05313d1535 223 Galaxy Man Man 5fcc67f2b3d34273aed1c7eb 607a694ef15349fedcd0d428 224 Veramons 5fcc6a4368d20e77eba1acd3 60797f9d096afeed47734d8b 225 Purity 88 5fcceeb6c68845038e77ccef 607a69341b9755f4a5dc12b7 226 Alibean 5fcd447991d2e542df76115e 60a9b6deb55e040ec7c02e6d 227 burguerazul 5fce93f991d2e587f676117c 60c083f5dac04a4e521c539a 228 nativeeast 5fce985f1b3ca391133a2a3a 60b7b74ed4405e1a2aa70439 229 bosscosmetics 5fce9e7ab1d5b403205f45cf 60bea024144bf930a7bb9232 230 Ghombro 5fd1e5f149eb683a3d8a794e 60b42786daa7bdbd5055d734 231 Pasardo Store 5fd26b828145f8200fa527b3 60b57724d81faf6dcce0685c 232 Tobys St-tore 5fd28366e2ffdf350da7c044 60b4b62109a1a9ee98352152 233 Store My Tinos 5fd28a6280265a004af9709f 60aed9506c645945b5b3ffac 234 Anime_MyS 5fd29fdc53011c10b704b692 60b56a3d40d411290a570585 235 Elizabetbus 5fd3ad5dc64c70acd276ab30 60bf07a0b5e81dd844a9c213 236 Impulsively 5fd3c06f58cd77c3d6e7f65c 60dd08f4d5cc565f3bb09726 237 Charlesparkle 5fd5226a7885461cb1393636 60ce20fb12d62d54f333c42b 238 Heavenly4 5fd79922c4fa1b3faa6300ef 60bf06ce4cbb11c99c04b467 239 Cauthias 5fd7cca74706208bd3206bc3 60d2c86fe4f5ed566b4da291 240 Jaycjohnso 5fd8161c8076461c3fbfcdf4 60c23f7beca8eaeda7117f8f 241 Lovvly 5fda974856a431861eef123e 60cd104be6ea27ca2d098c42 242 dtryeuy 5fe2e5eaf35ecb61eff524ae 60a3703db4922f88b09d52d2 Creative and novel 243 600f6d62bc5d790f90f74a6b 6077c8913d7953f653688a87 shop 244 WANGZ4599CFCF 6040771586290b0bc09c72dd 608167ce57dcb1da65378a24 245 zhaojihua2412 604d74659d156e5eaf1d7457 60865c126315badbd8b957a1 246 tianfengxia3628 6064066a7603f804dca5f32b 60faa730a5eb40863d390a1d 247 Sand Corruptions 6064ee0a28856b004262c9f2 60ba1a4dcf3883674b945f59 248 wangyujun896 60682a6ae08c778173ae24be 60adabda07fc2d5a7dd6d08f 249 chongzhiauu 60727f5b0e3b2992bfd4403b 609366712de88751e2af3a7c 250 tkbx1122 6077d22ceaf4c85900af739d 60963017a54105e88c89feaf 251 Johsonxi 60927ab4854dbf530c7231ed 60cc3b40bf9c8bf2821b3765 252 wangxiaofei223368 609b5337e6e60f2306254001 60d2ae1a411d610046ae8530