United States v. Bailey

76 M.J. 266, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 294
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided April 20, 2017·No. No. 17-0265/CG·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CCA 1428. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues:

I. UPON REQUEST BY THE DEFENSE COUNSEL AND USING A DEFENSE-DRAFTED INSTRUCTION, SHOULD THE MILITARY JUDGE HAVE PROVIDED THE MEMBERS WITH AN EXPLANATION OF THE TERM “INCAPABLE”?

II. WHETHER THE DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES COAST GUARD COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS IS AMBIGUOUS AS TO WHETHER THE AFFIRMED SENTENCE INCLUDED FORFEITURE OF ALL PAY AND ALLOWANCES.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25 on Issue I only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bailey, 76 M.J. 266, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 294 (Ark. 2017).

76 M.J. 266 (United States v. Bailey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bailey
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2017