United States v. Backus

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Backus

669 F. App'x 120

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 3, 2016·No. No. 16-6298·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terrance Backus appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence based on amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines for drug offenses and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Backus, No. 1:08-cr-00128-MR-DLH-3 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2016; Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Terrance Backus appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence based on amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines for drug offenses and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Backus, No. 1:08-cr-00128-MR-DLH-3 (W.D.N.C. Jan. 19, 2016; Feb. 12, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Backus, 669 F. App'x 120 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

669 F. App'x 120 (United States v. Backus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related