United States v. Avila
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Clerk
____________________
No. 03-40173 USDC No. C-02-CR-244-1
Summary Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
ALEJANDRO AVILA, JR, also known as Gregory Luis Salcedo
Defendant - Appellant
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern of Texas _________________________________________________________________
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alejandro Avila, Jr.’s, retained attorney, Albert A. Pena,
III, has moved to withdraw as appellate counsel. Retained counsel
may withdraw at will; therefore, the motion is GRANTED. As Avila
has not provided this court with any indication that his appeal has
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. merit, the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Avila (United States v. Avila) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.