United States v. Avila
This text of United States v. Avila (United States v. Avila) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS August 18, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Clerk
____________________
No. 03-40173 USDC No. C-02-CR-244-1
Summary Calendar ____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
ALEJANDRO AVILA, JR, also known as Gregory Luis Salcedo
Defendant - Appellant
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern of Texas _________________________________________________________________
Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alejandro Avila, Jr.’s, retained attorney, Albert A. Pena,
III, has moved to withdraw as appellate counsel. Retained counsel
may withdraw at will; therefore, the motion is GRANTED. As Avila
has not provided this court with any indication that his appeal has
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. merit, the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Avila, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-avila-ca5-2003.