United States v. Avalos-Barriga

362 F. App'x 615
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2010·No. No. 06-56693·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Federal prisoner Enrique Avalos-Barri-ga appeals from the district court’s judg[616] ment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

Because Avalos-Barriga’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel during trial has been explicitly addressed in a previous proceeding, we will not reconsider that issue. See United States v. Avalos-Barriga, 21 Fed.Appx. 626 (9th Cir.2001).

We deny Avalos-Barriga’s request to expand the certificate of appealability. See 9th Cir. R. 22 — 1(e); see also Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Avalos-Barriga, 362 F. App'x 615 (9th Cir. 2010).

362 F. App'x 615 (United States v. Avalos-Barriga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Todd Hiivala v. Tana Wood
195 F.3d 1098 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
United States v. Avalos-Barriga
21 F. App'x 626 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)