United States v. Avalos-Barriga
This text of 362 F. App'x 615 (United States v. Avalos-Barriga) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Federal prisoner Enrique Avalos-Barri-ga appeals from the district court’s judg[616]*616ment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
Because Avalos-Barriga’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel during trial has been explicitly addressed in a previous proceeding, we will not reconsider that issue. See United States v. Avalos-Barriga, 21 Fed.Appx. 626 (9th Cir.2001).
We deny Avalos-Barriga’s request to expand the certificate of appealability. See 9th Cir. R. 22 — 1(e); see also Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
362 F. App'x 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-avalos-barriga-ca9-2010.