United States v. Augustin Gomez Luna
This text of 539 F.2d 417 (United States v. Augustin Gomez Luna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Augustin Gomez Luna was convicted by a jury of possession with intent to distribute approximately 304 pounds of marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and he appeals.
In the course of his closing argument, the prosecuting attorney stated,
“Did we ever hear any statements that the defendant made as to this is not my stuff, I’m looking for my friends? You guys have the wrong man, when he was arrested? Think about it.” 1
In Doyle v. Ohio, 1976,-U.S.-, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91, the Supreme Court forbade usage of a defendant’s silence following arrest and Miranda warnings to impeach an explanation subsequently given at the trial. In United States v. Harp, 536 F.2d 601 (5th Cir. 1976), we applied Doyle to use of silence in an impeaching fashion during the course of the government’s closing argument. Accordingly, Luna’s conviction must be reversed and a new trial held.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
. The prosecutor’s comment referred to Luna’s silence after he had been arrested and warned as required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
539 F.2d 417, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-augustin-gomez-luna-ca5-1976.