United States v. Ashley Horn
This text of United States v. Ashley Horn (United States v. Ashley Horn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 24-2104 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Ashley Fern Horn, also known as Ashley Fern Nelson
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Central ____________
Submitted: December 6, 2024 Filed: December 11, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, SHEPHERD, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Ashley Horn appeals after the district court1 denied her a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Her counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, and has also submitted a brief challenging the denial of a reduction.
1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding that a reduction was not warranted based on the seriousness of Horn’s offense. See United States v. Granados, 830 F.3d 840, 842-43 (8th Cir. 2016) (per curiam) (defendant not automatically entitled to reduction pursuant to § 3582(c)(2); district court’s denial of reduction reviewed for abuse of discretion).
Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Ashley Horn, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ashley-horn-ca8-2024.