United States v. Ashe

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 2009
Docket08-8364
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Ashe (United States v. Ashe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ashe, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8364

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHARLES ANTHONY ASHE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:01-cr-00063-DKC-1)

Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 22, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished by per curiam opinion.

Charles Anthony Ashe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles Anthony Ashe, Jr., appeals the district

court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Ashe, No. 8:01-cr-00063-DKC-1 (D. Md. Oct. 24, 2008). We deny

Ashe’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Ashe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ashe-ca4-2009.