United States v. Ashe
This text of United States v. Ashe (United States v. Ashe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8364
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CHARLES ANTHONY ASHE, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (8:01-cr-00063-DKC-1)
Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 22, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished by per curiam opinion.
Charles Anthony Ashe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wilkinson, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Charles Anthony Ashe, Jr., appeals the district
court’s order denying his motion for modification of sentence
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Ashe, No. 8:01-cr-00063-DKC-1 (D. Md. Oct. 24, 2008). We deny
Ashe’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Ashe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ashe-ca4-2009.