United States v. Ashby
This text of 488 F. App'x 731 (United States v. Ashby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thomas Lee Ashby appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). The court denied the motion because the Guidelines amendments did not lower Ashby’s Guidelines sentence. We conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion. United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense [732]*732with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 F. App'x 731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ashby-ca4-2012.