United States v. Arnold

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Arnold. Read the opinion of the Court — 416 F.3d 349
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 11, 2002·No. 01-41210·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41210 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GRAYLAND ARTHUR ARNOLD,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:97-CR-155 - - - - - - - - - - December 11, 2002

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Grayland Arthur Arnold, federal prisoner #06584-078, appeals

the district court’s denial of his motion for downward departure

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). Arnold has failed to show that

relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) or (c)(2) is available

to him as there has been no motion from the Director of the

Bureau of Prisons, and he has not alleged any amendment to or

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-41210 -2-

modification of the sentencing guidelines in effect when he was

sentenced. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i) & (c)(2).

This appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous.

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983).

Accordingly, it is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Arnold, (5th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Arnold (United States v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howard v. King
707 F.2d 215 (Fifth Circuit, 1983)