United States v. Aris Ramirez-Alvarez
This text of 360 F. App'x 589 (United States v. Aris Ramirez-Alvarez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Aris Benjamin Ramirez-Alvarez has moved for appointment of counsel to represent him on appeal of his December 13, 2004 amended judgment of conviction for illegal entry into the United States. This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir.1987). The judgment Ramirez-Alvarez seeks to appeal was issued by a federal magistrate judge, and a federal magistrate judge’s judgment of conviction and sentence may be appealed only to a federal district court. See 18 U.S.C. § 3402; Fed. R.Crim. P. 58(g)(2); see also United States v. Baxter, 19 F.3d 155, 156 (4th Cir.1994). Thus, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal.
Ramirez-Alvarez’s motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
360 F. App'x 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-aris-ramirez-alvarez-ca5-2010.