United States v. Arinthius Johnson
This text of United States v. Arinthius Johnson (United States v. Arinthius Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-3279 ___________________________
United States of America
Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Arinthius Johnson
Defendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis ____________
Submitted: September 23, 2019 Filed: October 11, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before KELLY, MELLOY, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Arinthius Johnson received a below-Guidelines-range, 96-month prison sentence after pleading guilty to possessing a firearm as a felon. 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). On appeal, he argues that the district court 1 erroneously
1 The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. -1- counted his prior Missouri conviction of unlawful use of a weapon as a “crime of violence,” which increased his base offense level under the Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. §§ 2K2.1(a)(2), 4B1.2(a); see also Mo. Rev. Stat. § 571.030.1(4). We considered and rejected this argument in United States v. Hudson, 851 F.3d 807 (8th Cir. 2017). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Arinthius Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-arinthius-johnson-ca8-2019.