United States v. Arias-Quintanilla

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: May 17, 2022
• Docket: 21-51080
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 21-51080 Document: 00516321653 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/17/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED May 17, 2022 No. 21-51080 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Edwin Yovani Arias-Quintanilla,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CR-531-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Edwin Yovani Arias-Quintanilla was convicted and sentenced for illegal reentry after removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). He now argues for the first time that § 1326(b) is unconstitutional. Arias-Quintanilla has nonetheless filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance and a letter brief explaining that he raises the issue to preserve it and correctly

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-51080 Document: 00516321653 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/17/2022

No. 21-51080

conceding his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 226 (1998). See, e.g., United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 553– 54 (5th Cir. 2019). Summary disposition is therefore appropriate. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969). As such, we GRANT Arias-Quintanilla’s unopposed motion and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.