United States v. Aquabeus Moore

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7379 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/03/2022 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7379

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AQUABEUS MOORE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:15-cr-00386-RMG-2)

Submitted: April 28, 2022 Decided: June 3, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aquabeus Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7379 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/03/2022 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Aquabeus Moore appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for

compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the

record on appeal and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

Moore’s motion. See United States v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (providing

standard), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). Accordingly, we deny Moore’s motion for

appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States

v. Moore, No. 2:15-cr-00386-RMG-2 (D.S.C. Sept. 13, 2021). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED