United States v. Apel

676 F.3d 1202, 2012 WL 1423914
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 25, 2012·No. Nos. 11-50003, 11-50004, 11-50005·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Appellant John Apel, who was subject to a pre-existing order barring him from [1203] Vandenberg Air Force Base, was convicted of three counts of trespassing on the base in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1382. After his convictions became final in district court, we decided United States v. Parker, 651 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir.2011). Parker held that because a stretch of highway running through Vandenberg AFB is subject to an easement “granted to the State of California, which later relinquished it to the County of Santa Barbara,” the federal government lacks the exclusive right of possession of the area on which the trespass allegedly occurred; therefore, a conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1382 cannot stand, regardless of an order barring a defendant from the base. 651 F.3d at 1184.

Although we question the correctness of Parker, it is binding, dispositive of this appeal, and requires that Apel’s convictions be REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Apel, 676 F.3d 1202, 2012 WL 1423914 (9th Cir. 2012).

676 F.3d 1202 (United States v. Apel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Apel
676 F.3d 1202 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)