United States v. Antonio D. Stephens
This text of 439 F.3d 1083 (United States v. Antonio D. Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER
The majority of the panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc. Judge Clifton would grant the petition.
The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc reconsideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 F.3d 1083, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 5777, 2006 WL 549026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-antonio-d-stephens-ca9-2006.