United States v. Antonio Alonzo
This text of 710 F. App'x 275 (United States v. Antonio Alonzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Antonio Jose Alonzo appeals from the district court’s 1 order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Following de novo review, we agree with the district court that Alonzo was ineligible for the requested sentence reduction based on an amendment to the United States Sentencing Guidelines because his original sentence was derived from the applicable statutory minimum. See United States v. Moore, 734 F.3d 836, 837-38 (8th Cir. 2013). We affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Ralph R, Erickson, then • United States District Judge for the District of North Dakota, now United States Circuit Judge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
710 F. App'x 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-antonio-alonzo-ca8-2018.