United States v. Antoine Terry

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 16, 2024
Docket24-6416
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Antoine Terry (United States v. Antoine Terry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Antoine Terry, (4th Cir. 2024).

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6416 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6416

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTOINE ELTORIO TERRY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Irene C. Berger, District Judge. (2:20-cr-00036-1)

Submitted: September 12, 2024 Decided: September 16, 2024

Before THACKER and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antoine Eltorio Terry, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6416 Doc: 5 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Antoine Eltorio Terry appeals the district court’s opinion and judgment order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Part A of

Amendment 821 to the Sentencing Guidelines, and its subsequent order denying Terry’s

motion for reconsideration of that ruling. We have reviewed the record and discern no

reversible error. See United States v. Spruhan, 989 F.3d 266, 269 (4th Cir. 2021) (stating

standard). That is, because Terry’s 120-month sentence is below the low end of the

amended range and not a result of substantial assistance, the court correctly concluded that

Terry is ineligible for a sentence reduction. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

§ 1B1.10(b)(2)(A), p.s.; Spruhan, 989 F.3d at 269-70. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s rulings. United States v. Terry, No. 2:20-cr-00036-1 (S.D. W. Va. Jan. 17, 2024 &

Mar. 18, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Guy Spruhan
989 F.3d 266 (Fourth Circuit, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Antoine Terry, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-antoine-terry-ca4-2024.