United States v. Anthony Chosewood

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 2, 2026
• Docket: 24-7123
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-7123 Doc: 18 Filed: 03/02/2026 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-7123

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY SCOTT CHOSEWOOD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:18-cr-00618-JFA-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2026 Decided: March 2, 2026

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Kimberly H. Albro, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Brook B. Andrews, Acting United States Attorney, Leesa Washington, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-7123 Doc: 18 Filed: 03/02/2026 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Scott Chosewood appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 821 to the

Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and discern no abuse of discretion

in the denial of Chosewood’s motion. See United States v. Spruhan, 989 F.3d 266, 269

(4th Cir. 2021) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.

United States v. Chosewood, No. 3:18-cr-00618-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Nov. 8, 2024). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED