United States v. Andre Roach

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: December 10, 2024
• Docket: 24-6008
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6008 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/10/2024 Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANDRE RICARDO ROACH, a/k/a Squeaky, a/k/a Redrum, a/k/a Rum,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, Chief District Judge. (1:11-cr-00526-GLR-1)

Submitted: December 5, 2024 Decided: December 10, 2024

Before GREGORY and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Ricardo Roach, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-6008 Doc: 8 Filed: 12/10/2024 Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:

Andre Ricardo Roach appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a

reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and denying reconsideration.

“We review a district court’s decision [whether] to reduce a sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for abuse of discretion and its ruling as to the scope of its legal authority under

§ 3582(c)(2) de novo.” United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013). Our

review of the record reveals no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

orders. United States v. Roach, No. 1:11-cr-00526-GLR-1 (D. Md. Sept. 15, 2023;

Dec. 13, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED