United States v. Andre Miller
This text of United States v. Andre Miller (United States v. Andre Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________
No. 20-3056 September Term, 2020
1:04-cr-00460-RJL-1
Filed On: March 15, 2021
United States of America,
Appellee
v.
Andre Miller,
Appellant
ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BEFORE: Rogers, Millett, and Wilkins, Circuit Judges
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the briefs filed by the parties, and appellant’s Rule 28(j) letter. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 36. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 16, 2020, be affirmed. Appellant requested compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), which allows a court to reduce a defendant’s sentence if it determines “extraordinary and compelling reasons” warrant release after considering relevant factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), including the seriousness of the offense and the potential danger the defendant presents to the community. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying release. Cf. United States v. Smith, 896 F.3d 466, 470 (D.C. Cir. 2018) (applying abuse of discretion standard to motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), based on the Sentencing Commission’s subsequent lowering of a sentencing range).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 20-3056 September Term, 2020
of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Deputy Clerk
Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Andre Miller, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-andre-miller-cadc-2021.