United States v. Andrade-Castaneda

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Andrade-Castaneda

256 F. App'x 731

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 5, 2007·No. 07-10237·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case following remand's for resentencing, Damacio Andrade-Castaneda raises arguments that are foreclosed by the law of the case doctrine. See United States v. Matthews, 312 F.3d 652, 657 (5th Cir.2002) (holding that under the law of the case doctrine, an issue of fact or law decided on appeal may not be reexamined by the appellate court on a subsequent appeal). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case following remand's for resentencing, Damacio Andrade-Castaneda raises arguments that are foreclosed by the law of the case doctrine. See United States v. Matthews, 312 F.3d 652, 657 (5th Cir.2002) (holding that under the law of the case doctrine, an issue of fact or law decided on appeal may not be reexamined by the appellate court on a subsequent appeal). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Andrade-Castaneda, 256 F. App'x 731 (5th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

256 F. App'x 731 (United States v. Andrade-Castaneda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related