United States v. Anderson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Anderson

474 F. App'x 279

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 26, 2012·No. No. 12-6422·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lynval Kerris Anderson, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Acr cordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Anderson, No. 2:98-cr00143-HCM-1 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 18, 2012 & entered Jan. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lynval Kerris Anderson, Jr. appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Acr cordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Anderson, No. 2:98-cr00143-HCM-1 (E.D. Va. filed Jan. 18, 2012 & entered Jan. 19, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Anderson, 474 F. App'x 279 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

474 F. App'x 279 (United States v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related