United States v. Anderson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 161 F. App'x 253
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2008·No. 08-6216·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6216

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DEWAYNE ANDERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:06-cr-00020-IMK-JSK-8)

Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 29, 2008

Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dewayne Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dewayne Anderson appeals the district court’s order

denying his second motion for relief from judgment pursuant to

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(4). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Anderson, No. 1:06-cr-00020-IMK-JSK-8 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 16, 2008).

We also deny the motion for bail or release pending appeal as moot.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Anderson, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Anderson (United States v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.