United States v. Anderson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7781

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PAMELA J. ANDERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-95, CA-01-564-2)

Submitted: April 17, 2002 Decided: April 29, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pamela J. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy John Stinson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Pamela J. Anderson appeals the district court’s orders denying

her motion for modification of sentence and her motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record

and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Anderson, Nos. CR-96-95; CA-01-564-2 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 24,

entered Aug. 27, 2001; Oct. 4, 2001). The petition for a writ of

mandamus is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED