United States v. Anderson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6567

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PAMELA J. ANDERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-95)

Submitted: August 29, 2000 Decided: October 19, 2000

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Pamela J. Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. John Phillip Ellington, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Pamela J. Anderson appeals the district court’s order denying

her motion to suspend imposition of sentence. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Anderson, No. CR-96-95 (E.D. Va. Apr.

4, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although the district court’s judgment or order is marked as “filed” on April 3, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on April 4, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the judgment or order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).