United States v. Anderson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7388

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DON BENNY ANDERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior Dis- trict Judge. (CR-83-159-A, CA-97-749-AM)

Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 28, 1998

Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Don Benny Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Kenneth E. Melson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-

pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Anderson, Nos. CR-83-159-A; CA-97-749-AM

(E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 1997). Appellant’s motions for the production

of transcripts at government expense are denied, as is Appellant’s

misdirected Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We deny Appellant’s mo-

tion for the appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the deci-

sional process.

DISMISSED