United States v. Amos

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Amos. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 F. App'x 83
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 4, 2005·No. 04-2585·Unpublished

Opinion

Opinions of the United 2005 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

5-4-2005

USA v. Amos Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 04-2585

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

Recommended Citation "USA v. Amos" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 1248. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/1248

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu. NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 04-2585

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

ROLAND AMOS

Appellant

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (D.N.J. Criminal No. 03-774) District Judge: Honorable John W. Bissell

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) April 21, 2005

Before: ROTH, FUENTES, and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges.

(Filed: May 4, 2005) ____

OPINION OF THE COURT

FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

Roland Amos pled guilty to distribution, and possession with intent to distribute, more than 5 grams of crack cocaine. Amos’ sentence was enhanced under U.S.S.G. § 4A.1.1(e)

because the District Court determined that the offense took placed less than two years after

his release from custody for prior offenses. Amos appeals his sentence and seeks a remand

pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. __, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005).

Having determined that issues with respect to Booker are best determined by the

District Court in the first instance, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in

accordance with that opinion. See United States v. Davis, 2005 WL 976941 (3d Cir. Apr.

28, 2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Amos, (3d Cir. 2005).

United States v. Amos (United States v. Amos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related