United States v. Amos

Third Circuit

United States v. Amos

127 F. App'x 83

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 4, 2005·No. No. 04-2585·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

Roland Amos pled guüty to distribution, and possession with intent to distribute, more than 5 grams of crack cocaine. Amos’ sentence was enhanced under U.S.S.G. § 4A.l.l(e) because the District Court determined that the offense took placed less than two years after his release from custody for prior offenses. Amos appeals his sentence and seeks a remand pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

[84]*84Having determined that issues with respect to Booker are best determined by the District Court in the first instance, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with that opinion. See United States v. Davis, 2005 WL 976941 (Sd Cir. Apr.28, 2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

Roland Amos pled guüty to distribution, and possession with intent to distribute, more than 5 grams of crack cocaine. Amos’ sentence was enhanced under U.S.S.G. § 4A.l.l(e) because the District Court determined that the offense took placed less than two years after his release from custody for prior offenses. Amos appeals his sentence and seeks a remand pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

[84]*84Having determined that issues with respect to Booker are best determined by the District Court in the first instance, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with that opinion. See United States v. Davis, 2005 WL 976941 (Sd Cir. Apr.28, 2005).

United States v. Amos, 127 F. App'x 83 (3d Cir. 2005).

Pincite

127 F. App'x 83 (United States v. Amos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related