United States v. Amos

Third Circuit

United States v. Amos

127 F. App'x 83

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 4, 2005

DocketNo. 04-2585

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 F. App'x 83 (United States v. Amos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Amos, 127 F. App'x 83 (3d Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

Roland Amos pled guüty to distribution, and possession with intent to distribute, more than 5 grams of crack cocaine. Amos’ sentence was enhanced under U.S.S.G. § 4A.l.l(e) because the District Court determined that the offense took placed less than two years after his release from custody for prior offenses. Amos appeals his sentence and seeks a remand pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

[84]*84Having determined that issues with respect to Booker are best determined by the District Court in the first instance, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with that opinion. See United States v. Davis, 2005 WL 976941 (Sd Cir. Apr.28, 2005).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

FUENTES, Circuit Judge.

Roland Amos pled guüty to distribution, and possession with intent to distribute, more than 5 grams of crack cocaine. Amos’ sentence was enhanced under U.S.S.G. § 4A.l.l(e) because the District Court determined that the offense took placed less than two years after his release from custody for prior offenses. Amos appeals his sentence and seeks a remand pursuant to United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

[84]*84Having determined that issues with respect to Booker are best determined by the District Court in the first instance, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with that opinion. See United States v. Davis, 2005 WL 976941 (Sd Cir. Apr.28, 2005).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 F. App'x 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-amos-ca3-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack