United States v. Amaro-Morales
This text of 320 F. App'x 742 (United States v. Amaro-Morales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Luis Alberto Amaro-Morales appeals from the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we dismiss.
Amaro-Morales challenges his sentence on multiple grounds. We conclude that the appeal waiver contained in his plea agreement is valid and enforceable and precludes our review of his contentions. See United States v. Nunez, 223 F.3d 956, 958 (9th Cir.2000); see also Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); United States v. Lopez-Armenta, 400 F.3d 1173, 1176-77 (9th Cir.2005).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F. App'x 742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-amaro-morales-ca9-2009.