United States v. Alvarado

4 F. App'x 508
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2001·No. No. 00-50226; D.C. No. CR-99-00146-DOC·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Salvador Alvarado appeals his 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegally reentering the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We affirm.

Alvarado contends that the district court improperly enhanced his sentence on the basis of prior aggravated felony convictions that were not charged in the indictment, submitted to a jury, or proved beyond a reasonable doubt, citing Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Alvarado’s contention is foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2001) (concluding that Apprendi did not overrule the Court’s holding in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), that prior aggravated felonies need not be alleged in the indictment, submitted to a jury, or proved beyond a reasonable doubt).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alvarado, 4 F. App'x 508 (9th Cir. 2001).

4 F. App'x 508 (United States v. Alvarado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pacheco-Zepeda v. United States
532 U.S. 966 (Supreme Court, 2001)