United States v. Alvarado

4 F. App'x 508

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: February 23, 2001
• Docket: No. 00-50226; D.C. No. CR-99-00146-DOC
• Status: Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM²

Salvador Alvarado appeals his 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegally reentering the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We affirm.

Alvarado contends that the district court improperly enhanced his sentence on the basis of prior aggravated felony convictions that were not charged in the indictment, submitted to a jury, or proved beyond a reasonable doubt, citing Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Alvarado’s contention is foreclosed by our recent decision in United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2001) (concluding that Apprendi did not overrule the Court’s holding in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), that prior aggravated felonies need not be alleged in the indictment, submitted to a jury, or proved beyond a reasonable doubt).

AFFIRMED.

2 . This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.