United States v. Alvar Toledo
This text of 693 F. App'x 701 (United States v. Alvar Toledo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Alvar Gante Toledo appeals from the district court’s order granting in part his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court reduced Toledo’s sentence to 108 months, the bottom of the amended guideline range. .This was the *702 lowest sentence the court could impose. See U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(b)(2)(A). Toledo’s claim that he was eligible for a further reduction fails because he does not meet the requirements of U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(b)(2)(B). See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 cmt. n.3; United States v. Finazzo, 841 F.3d 816, 818-19 (9th Cir. 2016).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
693 F. App'x 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alvar-toledo-ca9-2017.