United States v. Alvar Toledo

693 F. App'x 701
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 17, 2017·No. 16-16185·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Alvar Gante Toledo appeals from the district court’s order granting in part his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

The district court reduced Toledo’s sentence to 108 months, the bottom of the amended guideline range. .This was the *702 lowest sentence the court could impose. See U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(b)(2)(A). Toledo’s claim that he was eligible for a further reduction fails because he does not meet the requirements of U.S.S.G. § lB1.10(b)(2)(B). See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 cmt. n.3; United States v. Finazzo, 841 F.3d 816, 818-19 (9th Cir. 2016).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alvar Toledo, 693 F. App'x 701 (9th Cir. 2017).

693 F. App'x 701 (United States v. Alvar Toledo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Tina-Marie Finazzo
841 F.3d 816 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)