United States v. Alvanez
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-8166
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EDWIN F. ALVANEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District Judge. (No. 8:07-cr-00326-DKC-2)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 27, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edwin F. Alvanez, Appellant Pro Se. James Marton Trusty, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Edwin Alvanez appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to retain a handwriting specialist. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny Alvanez's motions for transcript at government expense
and to retain a handwriting specialist, and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. * United States v. Alvanez,
No. 8:07-cr-00326-DKC-2 (D. Md. Nov. 16, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We decline to consider issues Alvanez raises in his informal brief which are not related to his present appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Alvanez (United States v. Alvanez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.