United States v. Alvanez

375 F. App'x 336

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edwin Alvanez appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to retain a handwriting specialist. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Alvanez’s motions for transcript at government expense and to retain a handwriting specialist, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.* United States v. Alvanez, No. 8:07-cr-00326-DKC-2 (D.Md. Nov. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

*

We decline to consider issues Alvanez raises in his informal brief which are not related to his present appeal.