United States v. Alonso-Yerena
This text of 56 F. App'x 320 (United States v. Alonso-Yerena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Martin Alonso-Yerena appeals his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). We dismiss.
On appeal, Alonso-Yerena challenges the district court’s denial of his motion for substitute counsel. However, Alonso-Yerena entered into a plea agreement in which he waived his right to appeal or collaterally attack his conviction and sentence. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1183 (9th Cir. 2000) (recognizing that courts will enforce waiver of appeal rights if waiver language encompasses defendant’s right to appeal on grounds claimed on appeal, and if waiver is knowingly and voluntarily made).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 F. App'x 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alonso-yerena-ca9-2003.