United States v. Allen
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Shawn Allen appeals his guilty-plea convictions and concurrent 151-month sentences imposed for two counts of bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Allen’s attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Allen has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
61 F. App'x 491 (United States v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.