United States v. Allen
This text of 131 F. App'x 553 (United States v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Marvin Allen appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and imposing an 18-month term of imprisonment followed by a 5-year term of supervised release. Allen was originally convicted of conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine and attempt to possess with the intent to distribute cocaine, all in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Allen has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.
Accordingly, we GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 F. App'x 553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-allen-ca9-2005.