United States v. All American Airways, Inc.

Ninth Circuit

United States v. All American Airways, Inc.

180 F.2d 592

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 4, 1950·No. 12347·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a consent judgment— a judgment which was consented to by appellant and appellee, and which the District Court had jurisdiction to render. Such a judgment is not reversible. Pacific R. R. v. Ketchum, 101 U.S. 289, 295, 25 L.Ed. 932; United States v. Babbitt, 104 U.S. 767, 768, 26 L.Ed. 921; Ballot v. United States, 1 Cir., 171 F. 404, 405; Curry v. Curry, 65 App.D.C. 47, 79 F.2d 172, 174; In re 4145 Broadway Hotel Co., 7 Cir., 100 F.2d 7, 8. See, also, Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. United States, 113 U.S. 261, 266, 5 S.Ct. 460, 28 L.Ed. 971; Swift & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311, 327, 48 S.Ct. 311, 72 L.Ed. 587. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a consent judgment— a judgment which was consented to by appellant and appellee, and which the District Court had jurisdiction to render. Such a judgment is not reversible. Pacific R. R. v. Ketchum, 101 U.S. 289, 295, 25 L.Ed. 932; United States v. Babbitt, 104 U.S. 767, 768, 26 L.Ed. 921; Ballot v. United States, 1 Cir., 171 F. 404, 405; Curry v. Curry, 65 App.D.C. 47, 79 F.2d 172, 174; In re 4145 Broadway Hotel Co., 7 Cir., 100 F.2d 7, 8. See, also, Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. United States, 113 U.S. 261, 266, 5 S.Ct. 460, 28 L.Ed. 971; Swift & Co. v. United States, 276 U.S. 311, 327, 48 S.Ct. 311, 72 L.Ed. 587. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.

United States v. All American Airways, Inc., 180 F.2d 592 (9th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

180 F.2d 592 (United States v. All American Airways, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related