United States v. Alfonza McCoy

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 21, 2018·No. 18-6587·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6587

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALFONZA MCCOY, a/k/a Pap,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:11-cr-00238-D-1)

Submitted: September 18, 2018 Decided: September 21, 2018

Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfonza McCoy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Alfonza McCoy appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for

reduction in sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Muldrow, 844 F.3d 434, 437

(4th Cir. 2016) (providing standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. McCoy, No. 5:11-cr-00238-D-1 (E.D.N.C. filed

May 8, 2018 & entered May 9, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alfonza McCoy, (4th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Alfonza McCoy (United States v. Alfonza McCoy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. William Muldrow
844 F.3d 434 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)