United States v. Alexander

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Alexander. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 F. App'x 207
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 25, 2003·No. 02-7768·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7768

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TONY B. ALEXANDER,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 03-6234

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-95-178)

Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 25, 2003 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony B. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Tony B. Alexander appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Alexander’s motion

for modification of his sentence and affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Alexander, No. CR-95-

178 (W.D.N.C., filed Jan. 17, 2003; entered Jan. 21, 2003). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Alexander, (4th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Alexander (United States v. Alexander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.