United States v. Alexander
This text of United States v. Alexander (United States v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7768
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TONY B. ALEXANDER,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 03-6234
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-95-178)
Submitted: March 20, 2003 Decided: March 25, 2003 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tony B. Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Tony B. Alexander appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Alexander’s motion
for modification of his sentence and affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Alexander, No. CR-95-
178 (W.D.N.C., filed Jan. 17, 2003; entered Jan. 21, 2003). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Alexander, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-alexander-ca4-2003.